Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 22856 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2003 14:44:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 22842 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 14:44:10 -0000 Received: from smtp.infores.com (192.152.134.67) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 14:44:10 -0000 Received: FROM chiexbr0.infores.com BY smtp.infores.com ; Thu Mar 06 08:44:03 2003 -0600 Received: from FRMSE01.fr.infores.com ([170.118.115.19]) by chiexbr0.infores.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:44:02 -0600 Received: from infores.com ([170.118.44.45]) by FRMSE01.fr.infores.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:43:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3E675EA7.8000003@infores.com> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 15:43:51 +0100 From: Laurent Blume User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: fr, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@httpd.apache.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030306162036.01dcc950@mail.laitek.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20030306162036.01dcc950@mail.laitek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2003 14:43:54.0326 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF872F60:01C2E3EE] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Delivering empty content? Why? > And still, yes! I am wondering why the pages are being whipped. > But you are helping with your post... So, basically are you saying that > I should expect this when using AV software? Maybe it is F-Secure after > all... > Yes, because basically, what AV software does, intercepting a try to open a file, reading and checking it, and then sending it to the process that is trying to access it. Normally, the AV software is running as a more privileged user (usually SYSTEM on Windows), so it has priority on a normal user process. But here, you have two processes belonging to SYSTEM, Apache and FSAV, fighting to open and read a file first. The least that can happen is severe perormance degradation (I had that problem with Norton AV on a development Win2000 Apache server, until I disabled it). What you can try to do is tweak the configuration of FSAV. For example, avoiding any check on Apache subdirs, or HTML files, or check only on writing a file, not for a simple read. You should be aware that those end-user AV software are *not* made to be used on a server, there are different versions for that (I spent a while working on FSAV in a distributed environment, with production servers and desktops clients). HTH, Laurent -- IRI-Secodip www.infores.com 4, rue Andr� Derain mailto:laurent.blume@infores.com F-78240 Chambourcy tel: +33 (0) 130 06 26 80 France fax: +33 (0) 130 65 09 45 --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org