Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99108 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2003 19:03:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99093 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 19:03:58 -0000 Received: from westpole.com (128.121.231.180) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 19:03:58 -0000 Received: from delldo.intra.westpole.com (64-204-187-66.client.dsl.net [64.204.187.66]) by westpole.com (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h26J42iF081856 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:04:03 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Stephen Colson Organization: West Pole, Inc. To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:58:56 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200303060958.58203.scolson@westpole.com> <200303061110.12010.scolson@westpole.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200303061358.56404.scolson@westpole.com> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Re: [users@httpd] htaccess problem Found the answer, so I figured I'd post it here so someone else searching= the=20 archives can find an answer: The short answer is mod_auth_pam. The longer answer is that on the raq's (and many other installs), mod_aut= h_pam=20 is installed (http://pam.sourceforge.net/mod_auth_pam/). The nature of th= is=20 plugin is contrary to what I was trying to accomplish. What I needed to d= o=20 was add a line to the top of my .htaccess or access.conf file: AuthPAM_Enabled off This fixes it. -s On Thursday 06 March 2003 11:18 am, Joshua Slive wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Stephen Colson wrote: > > Not entirely. My understanding of it was that apache on the raq's wil= l > > first check the system file, then if there was no match, would try to > > auth against any other defined ACL. This is how every other raq i've = seen > > works anyway... > > Well, I don't have direct experience iwth the raqs. I just have > experience with the dozens of confused people that turn up on apache > mailing lists and newsgroups because of the modifications they've made = to > apache. > > In general, if you have an auth problem with the raq, you need to bring= it > up with Sun, because there is no way for anyone else to know exactly wh= at > hacks they've done. > > Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org