httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason L Michael" <ja...@jason-michael.com>
Subject [users@httpd] Re: [apache] Re: [users@httpd] please help me kill apache..
Date Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:56:02 GMT
Again, off topic.  I'm going to set a mail rule to ignore you, Mr
Hademenos.

Wake me up when you say something interesting, or learn to use
punctuation or capital letters.

Geeeze,
JLM

----- Original Message -----
From: "George Hademenos" <hademenos@sbcglobal.net>
To: <users@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:50 AM
Subject: [apache] Re: [users@httpd] please help me kill apache..


> i am going to repeat this one last time....software engineers
or not....a
> make file is basically a batched instruction set to the
compiler...it is not
> necessary.
> ms code is in fact derived from berkeley...you are right on
that
> account..you can find your answers there as well.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Valpak" <gvalpak@yahoo.com>
> To: <users@httpd.apache.org>; <users@httpd.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] please help me kill apache..
>
>
> > At 07:27 AM 2/13/2003 -0600, George Hademenos wrote:
> > >if you know anything at all about compilers you know that
you don't have
> to
> > >have make files....you can compile and link manually when
you have to.
> >
> > If you know anything about working on or managing teams of
software
> engineers that have turned out 28 MB of source code, then you
know there is
> more than just raw source code involved in build the target(s).
Take a peek
> at the apache code, for instance (Just to try to keep this
remotely on topic
> :)
> >
> > How did headquarters come to release NT4.0 code to you,
particularly
> without imposing onerous licensing and confidentiality
agreements? I am
> aware that MS has licensed software source, probably of that
vintage to
> companies (such as Mainsoft IIRC) who were porting certain
aspects of it to
> unix systems. But that is not software that was "released" in
any sense of
> the imagination, and even if that is what you have, it is
certainly still
> subject to its licensing terms and keeping it on  your 12
dollar pc is
> probably not sufficient.
> >
> > Is this the source of your source?
> >
> > It also may very well be that the source code for the
resolver is based on
> FreeBSD-licensed stuff, as would be allowed under that license.
I may
> vaguely recall having read that conjecture at one time. But why
would MS
> have made the results public?
> >
> > Anyway, this is way off topic, and I am amused enough that I
better go
> back to bed before it is time to wake up...
> >
> > GV
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
------
> > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP
Server Project.
> > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more
info.
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> >    "   from the digest:
users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP
Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>    "   from the digest:
users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message