Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96127 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2003 18:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96071 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 18:34:28 -0000 Received: from mm02snlnto.sandia.gov (132.175.109.21) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 18:34:28 -0000 Received: from 132.175.109.4 by mm02snlnto.sandia.gov with ESMTP ( Tumbleweed MMS SMTP Relay (MMS v4.7)); Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:34:31 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 95b8ca9b-fe4b-44f7-8977-a6cb2d3025ff Received: from ES01SNLNT.sandia.gov (es01snlnt.sandia.gov [134.253.130.4]) by mailgate2.sandia.gov (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h0VIYTgu020145 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:34:29 -0700 (MST) Received: by es01snlnt.sandia.gov with Internet Mail Service ( 5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:34:31 -0700 Message-ID: <03781128C7B74B4DBC27C55859C9D7380948F73B@es06snlnt.sandia.gov> From: "Nebergall, Christopher" To: "Apache Users (E-mail)" Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:34:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-WSS-ID: 12241E3D234803-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: [users@httpd] Auth Modules and internal Redirects Is it possible to securely authenticate the initial request, then not re-authenticate the internally redirected request again? Mod_auth and mod_digest, always re-authenticate the user from scratch even on internally redirected requests. All the necessary information seems to be present to skip re-authenticating from scratch for internally redirected requests. The username and the authentication type used are still part of the connection structure and it is possible to determine that the request was an internal redirect, but I've never seen any module take advantage of this information to speed up authentication. It would be very beneficial to take advantage of this speed up for some authentication types that 1.) take a relatively long time to process, or 2.) are not reusable, and would fail if tried again. Could anyone comment whether it is secure to take this approach and not re-authenticate from scratch iff the request is not an initial request (meaning it's a sub-request or internal-redirect), the username field is not null, and the auth type is still valid for the location of the re-directed request? Thanks, Christopher Nebergall --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org