Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46309 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2002 23:43:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46201 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 23:43:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.busydata.com) (216.31.146.26) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 23:43:44 -0000 Received: from yeager (p467-tnt1.brs.ihug.com.au [203.173.189.213]) by mail.busydata.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-69954U1000L100S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:42:54 -0800 From: "Emma Grant" To: Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:38:56 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache 1.3.26 on Sun I've tried several times now to unsubscribe from the list. Can someone please help? Thanks. Emm -----Original Message----- From: DeAnna.Clemans@McKGenMed.com [mailto:DeAnna.Clemans@McKGenMed.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:59 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache 1.3.26 on Sun When you say how quickly static content moves - are you referring to pages like the HotQuery login screen? This all comes up with speed. Only when building the page from a query does it appear slow. DeAnna M. Clemans McKesson Medical Surgical Unix Systems Administrator 804-553-2316 "Porter, Mark" Mutual.com> cc: Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache 1.3.26 on Sun 12/19/2002 02:56 PM Please respond to users One more thing - you mentioned that you're using Cold Fusion and Hot Query. Have you checked how quickly static content moves? That would give you an indication about which half of the puzzle to pick at first: The web server, or the back end. -----Original Message----- From: DeAnna.Clemans@McKGenMed.com [mailto:DeAnna.Clemans@McKGenMed.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:28 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 1.3.26 on Sun The NT box has 1 400 mhz cpu. Currently have 75 to 200 users on NT. I am not familiar with running ab. Can you give me more information on that. DeAnna M. Clemans McKesson Medical Surgical Unix Systems Administrator 804-553-2316 "Jacob Coby" k.com> cc: Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 1.3.26 on Sun 12/19/2002 11:48 AM Please respond to users > 1) Hardware: E4500 with 8G ram 8 400mhz cpus What is the NT box running? > 3) Currently still testing so I have not opened it up to users. We do have > users accessing the same data on an NT box which is responding much > quicker. How many users? > 5) Now for the how slow is slow. I only > have the quickness of the NT server to > compare it to but the unix box is much more > powerful and is usually at least 75% idle. But how slow is the Sun server? We need numbers. All you've said so far is that the NT is the quickness, the Sun is the slowness, and that the Sun is usually idle. What you may be seeing is the 400mhz processor vs whatever the NT box is running. A single 1.2ghz machine serving 2 people is going to perform better than a 400mhz X 8 machine. But, when the load starts to climb, the slower multiprocessor machine will be able to scale much better, having a much more flat response curve than the single 1.2ghz machine. run ab with a large number of connections retreiving a dynamicly generated file against the NT and then against the Sun machine to see what I mean. You should see an initial lead with the NT box that drops off quickly, where the sun machine should pretty much respond the same throughout the entire test. -Jacob --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org