Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28199 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2003 00:54:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28185 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2003 00:54:41 -0000 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (HELO pd5mo3so.prod.shaw.ca) (24.71.223.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2003 00:54:41 -0000 Received: from pd3mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr1so-ser.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.177]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H8000HQKFUPIX@l-daemon> for users@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:54:25 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml8so.prod.shaw.ca (pn2ml8so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.152]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H8000JSZFUPUZ@l-daemon> for users@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:54:25 -0700 (MST) Received: from shaw.ca (h24-80-110-238.vf.shawcable.net [24.80.110.238]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H8000B85FUO0B@l-daemon> for users@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:54:25 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 16:50:47 -0800 From: "J. Greenlees" To: users@httpd.apache.org Message-id: <3E123B66.1000307@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 References: <1041381028.999.11.camel@mattsworkstation> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.0 on Linux Matt Simonsen wrote: > I have read that it is best to use the preforking version of Apache 2.0 > on Linux until the 2.6 kernel comes out. Is this the accepted Apache > group recommendation, too? > > I couldn't find any definitive statement on this, although I did read > the docs. The best I got was that preforking is the default for Unix. I > assume this is because many Unixes do not do threading well (and I > understand Linux is one). unix, linux, irix. which version of linux were you taling about? red hat, mandrake, debian, free-bsd, gentoo...... ( very long list ) every distribution has customised the *nix kernel to suit themselves. ( mandrake has "supermount" and pcmcia and networking as part of the kernel. supermount is an automount for file systems, threading in the kernal is being worked on for inclusion in next release [ version 9.1 ] I think I saw somewhere ) red hat is closer to a stock unix kernel, as are gentoo, debian and free-bsd. for this type of question linux is not a clear enough description for a good answer. to many variables depending on what distribution you have. ;) > > Also, do any of you have real world benchmarks? I wonder, too, if the > threaded will benefit even more from hyper-threading. > > Thanks > Matt > Jaqui --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org