Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97470 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2002 23:08:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97458 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2002 23:08:10 -0000 Received: from mail15.speakeasy.net (HELO mail.speakeasy.net) (216.254.0.215) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2002 23:08:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 31555 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2002 23:08:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO page) ([64.81.32.15]) (envelope-sender ) by mail15.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Dec 2002 23:08:25 -0000 Message-ID: <200212011506520359.01081D86@mail.speakeasy.org> In-Reply-To: References: <001401c298f5$9eb9a050$877ba8c0@tim> <3DE9B065.603@shaw.ca> <008301c2997c$399d4dc0$0201a8c0@atogstad> <200212011312560671.009FCF9F@mail.speakeasy.org> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (4) Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 15:06:52 -0800 From: "Steven Pierce" To: users@httpd.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache and Flash Gary, I agree Flash is OK, but it can be a PITA also. I will usually skip it= unless it is one of those that really catchs my eye. Not many do.... *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 12/1/2002 at 5:04 PM Gary Turner wrote: >Steven Pierce wrote: >>Alex Togstad wrote: <-- added, gt > > >>> I just want to see if I'm able to even go to your site. It *migh* be my >crappy >>>attbi dns servers tho. > >Alex, you might try running traceroute and ping to test the net. >> >>Alex, >> >>It is not you, it is the site. I went to the site also, and it was >coming up blank. >>I looked at the code on the site, and it is does not have much on it. > >I've looked at the site before, so DNS cache is probably alive. After >clearing the page cache, a get took about 0.6 sec. A subsequent get to >217.42.49.139 takes about 0.38 sec, and the reload about 0.33 sec. So >the site seems OK. > >For the most part, I consider frames and flash a PITA. This page isn't >bad, though. > >-- >gt kk5st@sbcglobal.net > If someone tells you--- > "I have a sense of humor, but that's not funny." > ---they don't. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. >See for more info. >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org