Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 83877 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2002 18:10:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 83829 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2002 18:10:00 -0000 Received: from bn0.blue.net (66.38.0.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2002 18:10:00 -0000 Received: from blue (darin.bginc.net [66.38.3.13]) by bn0.blue.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g9TI9xJs018230 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:10:00 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <000601c27f76$645ed440$0d032642@net.blue.net> From: "John Darin Holloway" To: References: <484A6CA492BE654395D208B1D8D5393972F6C6@SOMEXEVS001.ex.ordersx.org> <01a601c27f69$ca697e00$08071bce@WS4> <000c01c27f6b$077dac20$0d032642@net.blue.net> <01b401c27f6d$7232a640$08071bce@WS4> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:09:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Subject: Re: [users@httpd] a quick question or two I guess I'm a little fired up on the disparity of config/control, studying for Solaris Sysadmin (for 2.9) tests while using 2.7 machines at work (and FreeBSD at home) is enough to drive a webmonkey/sysadmin nuts. The original post came from my wondering what flavor of *nix the poster was using, and if my response were going to totally throw him off. John Darin Holloway Web Developer and System Administrator, Bluegrass Network, LLC jdholloway@blue.net --- http://www.blue.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacob Coby" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:05 PM Subject: Re: [users@httpd] a quick question or two > > linux != unix > > Precisely what the Linux acronym stands for ;) > > > The LSB or "UnitedLinux" can standardize these things within their > > community, but my rant was directed to IBM|HP|SUN|SGI and the open group > to > > set some standards on config/control. However it may be hard to do this > for > > AIX. Does SMIT generate config files for the kernel to process or does > the > > kernel read from the smit registry? > > I honestly don't know where this response came from? I was replying to Mr. > Boyle's comment of "but some Linuxes are very clever these days." > > Besides, what good would it do IBM, HP, SUN, or SGI to standardize this > stuff? These are proprietary OSs, and if you can just switch them out, why > use one over the other? > > -Jacob > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org