httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sujith Mathew <sujit...@myrealbox.com>
Subject Re: Please help me .....URGENT
Date Thu, 01 Aug 2002 19:36:09 GMT


I dont have a lot of static pages. The static pages i have can be 
renamed from .htm to .jsp and thus they will be cached by tomcat. Am i 
right?.
Will such pages have the same serving speed as apache+tomcat+ssl ?.

Thanks in advance
Sujith


French, Shawn wrote:

>If you have A LOT of static pages, then use Apache+Tomcat since tomcat can't
>match Apache's serving speed. 
>
>If most of your pages are dynamic, save yourself a configuration headache
>and just use tomcat.
>
>Shawn
>
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Sujith Mathew [mailto:sujithjm@myrealbox.com]
>>Sent: August 1, 2002 3:26 PM
>>To: users@httpd.apache.org
>>Subject: Please help me .....URGENT
>>
>>
>>Please help me .....
>>
>>My requirements are to serve JSP, Servlets, static pages and SSL(not
>>important). NO CGI, PERL, PHP etc.
>>
>>I am using a WINDOWS 2000 Server.*I want anyone to tell me whether i
>>should use APACHE+TOMCAT+SSL or TOMCAT+SSL.
>>
>>Please reply me fast , i am banking on you guys for a good answer.
>>
>>Thanks in advance
>>Sujith Mathew
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>>
>>    
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
>
>
>  
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message