httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "art" <...@macnew.com>
Subject RE: web log analyzer choices
Date Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:35:49 GMT
We use Urchin 2.XX still and most of the Virtual Clients are pleased
with the results...

Art MacNew

-----Original Message-----
From: Farid Hamjavar [mailto:hamjavar@unm.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:13 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: web log analyzer choices




Greetings,

our config: load-balanced rh 7.2 apache web servers with 1-2GB logs
weekly ....

Given our current status of not being very happy with what we got in
terms of web log analyzer, I did some research and based on our budget
we (think) we like either Urchin or Quest's Funnel Web Analyzer They
both meet our technical requirements and they both are pretty much same
price. Do any of you have any experience with any of the two?

thanks,
Farid
UNM



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message