Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87413 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2002 07:01:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87402 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 07:01:12 -0000 Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (151.164.30.28) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 07:01:12 -0000 Received: from ppp-208-188-30-66.dialup.rcsntx.swbell.net ([208.188.30.66]) by mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with SMTP id <0H0300M9UQ608B@mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net> for users@httpd.apache.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 02:01:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 02:01:10 -0500 From: Gary Turner Subject: Re: VitualHost problem finally fixed In-reply-to: To: users@httpd.apache.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 02:16:53 -0400, Admin wrote: >Well, thanks alot all you wonderful >so-called experts and people claiming this and that. I want to echo that. Thanks a lot. The level of expertise on this list is very nice to see. > >Most everybody on this list that claims to know something, >really frustrates me and others to no end....with their so-called >answers to questions. The so-called answers worked for me. Maybe I mistakenly sought a solution when I should have looked for an argument. > >I've been monitoring this list for a very long time, as well as >posting questions of my own. And most everytime i asked for help >someone claiming to know this or that, directed me (and others) >to look it up in the docs. Oh sure...they gave a short and sweet >so-called answer, but they always told us to GO LOOK IT UP. Geez. I thought RTFM was part of every answer--kinda like please and thank you. The short answer is usually good enough for me to start on, then I RTFM to learn the whys and wherefores. 'Course sometimes it's the other way around and the manual gets me started and the gurus flesh it out. > >Offering no help, but that, and i don't consider that help. As far as >that is concerned, I was led to believe that this list is supposed to >be for asking help and receiving same. Not just telling others to >"GO LOOK IT UP"...at least that is what is stated on the "support" > section on the apache website...for this list. My intro to users' lists was over at Debian-users. It doesn't take long to figure out that you're expected to really think through your problem, RTFM, and take Google to the limit before bringing it to the list. There are guys over there, and here to, that literally wrote the book. If you're ready to argue their specialties, you better have "looked it up" in a serious manner. > >Well, thanks for nothing !!!! Does this mean you're leaving? You might ponder this post's sig line. -- gt kk5st@swbell.net Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof. -- John Kenneth Galbraith, economist --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org