Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
Message-ID: <1026507354.3d2f425a7fd33@webmail.isp.nyc.eggn.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:55:54 -0400
From: Mark Mentovai <mark-list@mentovai.com>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: problems upgrading from 1.3.19 to 1.3.22
References: <001101c229e2$c5eb38f0$1c01a8c0@UPTEL.LOCAL>
In-Reply-To: <001101c229e2$c5eb38f0$1c01a8c0@UPTEL.LOCAL>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs

Michael J Humphries wrote:
> The only reason I chose that version is all of the docs that I have
> found say that this is the newest version of httpd that supports FP
> Extensions. I run an isp and we have had an overwhelming cry for
> microsloths FP. Does 1.3.26 have support for FP

Or, does the FrontPage implementation you're using have support for 
1.3.26?  There is more than one FrontPage implementation out there.  
Even if the one you're using doesn't explicitly say it will work, you 
may find that it does with minimal effort.

If you decide you must stick with 1.3.22, be sure to apply the security 
patch available at http://httpd.apache.org/.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org