Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29221 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2002 22:28:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29210 invoked from network); 29 May 2002 22:28:37 -0000 Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (HELO pimout2-int.prodigy.net) (207.115.63.101) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 May 2002 22:28:37 -0000 Received: from DTC2 (adsl-66-138-104-74.dsl.ltrkar.swbell.net [66.138.104.74]) by pimout2-int.prodigy.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id g4TMSg2207442 for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 18:28:42 -0400 Message-ID: <00c301c20760$2664f2c0$4a688a42@swbell.net> Reply-To: "Ron Wingfield" From: "Ron Wingfield" To: References: Subject: Re: Virtual Hosting Configuration for v2.0.28 Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 17:28:25 -0500 Organization: ArchAxis Network Services MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C20736.3CFF7C00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C20736.3CFF7C00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am beginning to think (as in agree with you) that v2.0.28 may be the = problem. I assume that v2.0.36 is the most current? I have just changed (. . .yet again) the 32bit IP addresses to an = asterisk, as you suggested, and tested -- no results. I don't think = that is the problem. From what I've read, the 1.2.3.4 IP address = scenario is OK, and necessary, for example, when and if I decide to = configure another virtual host on a different IP address (I have five = static IP's to dabble with). =20 Finally, I was concerned that the vhost_alias_module was "unnecessary = overhead". I assume that it is OK to remove the load instruction, and = all references from the httpd.conf? Thanks, Ron W. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Joshua Slive=20 To: users@httpd.apache.org ; Ron Wingfield=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:52 PM Subject: RE: Virtual Hosting Configuration for v2.0.28 Phone: (514) 398-4000 x00417 On Wed, 29 May 2002, Ron Wingfield wrote: > Problem: Apache v2.0.28 (as per my configuration, running with = FreeBSD You are several important versions behind. You should upgrade. > My httpd.conf file contains the following: > > NameVirtualHost 66.138.104.73 Everywhere you have 66.138.104.73 in NameVirtualHost and = , change it to *. > Question: I have assumed that the DocumentRoot directive > in the VirtualHost container would be sufficient to effectively > override the default DocumentRoot directive's path. Yes, that is true provided you have properly configured the ServerName and IP address (or *). Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C20736.3CFF7C00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am beginning to think (as in agree = with you) that=20 v2.0.28 may be the problem.  I assume that v2.0.36 is the most=20 current?
 
I have just changed (. . .yet again) = the 32bit IP=20 addresses to an asterisk, as you suggested, and tested -- no = results.  I=20 don't think that is the problem.  From what I've read, the 1.2.3.4 = IP=20 address scenario is OK, and necessary, for example, when and if I decide = to=20 configure another virtual host on a different IP address (I have five = static=20 IP's to dabble with). 
 
Finally, I was concerned that the=20 vhost_alias_module was "unnecessary overhead".  I = assume=20 that it is OK to remove the load instruction, and all references from = the=20 httpd.conf?
 
Thanks,
Ron W.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Joshua = Slive
To: users@httpd.apache.org ; Ron = Wingfield
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 = 4:52=20 PM
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosting=20 Configuration for v2.0.28

Phone: (514) 398-4000 x00417

On Wed, 29 May = 2002, Ron=20 Wingfield wrote:

> Problem:  Apache v2.0.28 (as per my=20 configuration, running with FreeBSD

You are several important = versions=20 behind.  You should upgrade.

> My httpd.conf file = contains the=20 following:
>
>    NameVirtualHost=20 66.138.104.73

Everywhere you have 66.138.104.73 in = NameVirtualHost and=20 <VirtualHost>,
change it to *.

> Question:  I = have=20 assumed that the DocumentRoot directive
> in the VirtualHost = container=20 would be sufficient to effectively
> override the default = DocumentRoot=20 directive's path.

Yes, that is true provided you have properly=20 configured the ServerName
and IP address (or=20 = *).

Joshua.


-------------------------------------------= --------------------------
To=20 unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@http= d.apache.org
For=20 additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
------=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C20736.3CFF7C00--