Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54425 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2002 09:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54412 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2002 09:50:04 -0000 Received: from bull.bourse.ch (HELO bull1.bourse.ch) (194.158.1.1) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2002 09:50:04 -0000 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by bull1.bourse.ch (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id KAA28699 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:50:14 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: bull1.bourse.ch: nobody set sender to using -f Received: from trifid2(172.20.196.132) by bull1 via smap (V2.1) id xma028655; Thu, 21 Mar 02 10:50:07 +0100 Received: from regulus.bourse.ch (regulus [172.20.196.148]) by trifid2.bourse.ch (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23785 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:50:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from bourse.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regulus.bourse.ch (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA07100 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:50:06 +0100 (MET) Sender: obo@bourse.ch Message-ID: <3C99ACCE.665B2235@bourse.ch> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:50:06 +0100 From: Owen Boyle X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts and References: <002301c1d08a$c492bde0$a977ca41@hithere> <20020321095646.I1982@cyan.csp.org.by> <000d01c1d0bc$99be5020$a977ca41@hithere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Lewis Watson wrote: > > Also, while doing some reading Linux Apache Web Server Administration > published by Sybex I found where this guy recommends using the > as little as possible. I actually wanted > to have one, even though they might be similar, for each virtual host. > Does this cause a problem with performance or what would be the > reasoning behind it? What *was* his reasoning behind it? Or did he just say "don't use ..." with no explanantion? AFAIK, , like and , is just a way of ascribing attributes to files. In other words, these directives are used to build a rulebase of what can and cannot be done when a request arrives for a file. I can't think of any reason *not* to use - unless "the guy" didn't like this method of refering to files. Rgds, Owen Boyle. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org