Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5107 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2002 16:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list users@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5096 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2002 16:34:23 -0000 Received: from bull.bourse.ch (HELO bull1.bourse.ch) (194.158.1.1) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2002 16:34:23 -0000 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by bull1.bourse.ch (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id RAA22420 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:34:24 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: bull1.bourse.ch: nobody set sender to using -f Received: from trifid2(172.20.196.132) by bull1 via smap (V2.1) id xma022317; Tue, 5 Mar 02 17:34:14 +0100 Received: from regulus.bourse.ch (regulus [172.20.196.148]) by trifid2.bourse.ch (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA26054 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:34:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from bourse.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regulus.bourse.ch (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22763 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:34:11 +0100 (MET) Sender: obo@bourse.ch Message-ID: <3C84F383.6295756B@bourse.ch> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 17:34:11 +0100 From: Owen Boyle X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Dumb compile question - on live server? References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020305095449.0394ceb0@mail.driftwood.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jonathan wrote: > > We have a production RH 6.2 server with RH's "Secure Web" server, and need > to recompile Apache to include Front Page extensions for a client. > > Dumb question to some, I know, but I'm compelled & paranoid enough to ask: > > Can we safely compile & install the newest verion of Apache (1.3.23) on a > live - in production - web server? Is it really as simple as installing > the fresh sources, config/make/install the binary, and restarting > Apache? We really only seem to need mod_ssl, mod_perl and FP; but can't > get FP witout recompiling. > > Anxious to not interupt the active sites on the server, nor paint ourselves > into a corner via overwriting anything. But I would rather avoid having to > build up a new box, doing the compile, and migrating the sites manually. > > It'll be my first Apache compile (yeah!). On a twin 1.7g CPU, 1-gig RAM, > UW-SCSI firebreather. So any relevant optimization (or links to) settings > anyone can recommend for twin-CPU boxes would be also sincerely appreciated. This would be a scary thing to do - especially with FP which is, arguably, the worst thing you will ever have to compile into apache. Is it not possible to build the FP-apache on another, less critical machine? even if the machines are not binary compatible, you could at least verify that the compiled executable works before working on the production server. When you do work on the production machine, I would certain *stop* apache before overwriting the binary. Remember that the parent process uses the binary to instantiate new httpd daemons and if the binary has changed you will get a very funny error (I think it seg-faults). Rgds, Owen Boyle. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org