httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joshua Slive" <jos...@slive.ca>
Subject RE: Rights - Solved
Date Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:32:19 GMT

> From: obo@bourse.ch [mailto:obo@bourse.ch]

> Daniel Grace wrote:
> >
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to:
> > allow from 192.168.1.    <-- note ending period.
> >
> > Wouldn't 192.168.1 match 192.168.153.xxx  as well?
> > (Granted, 192.168.x.y is a private network address so it may
> not matter, but
> > still I'm curous)
>
> I haven't read the source, but I guess from the documentation that this
> ambiguity is taken care of. There are a few examples which imply that if
> you want to control access to network x.y.z.0, you define it as "x.y.z"

Yes -- without checking -- I'm pretty sure you are correct.  It is NOT a
substring match.  It matches only on complete segments.

Joshua.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message