Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-de-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41137 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2005 10:03:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2005 10:03:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 3267 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2005 10:03:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-users-de-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2859 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2005 10:03:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-de-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users-de@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users-de@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2846 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2005 10:03:49 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 03:03:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [194.8.194.214] (HELO mrbusi2.netcologne.de) (194.8.194.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 03:03:41 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [195.135.135.62]) by mrbusi2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09082400BC for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:03:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42DCCFF7.2080507@uzulabs.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:03:35 +0200 From: Paul Puschmann User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users-de@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: apache2 performance References: <20050718044816.57426.22@mobile.intern.polynaturedesign.com> <42DB4059.9000305@uzulabs.net> <20050718122824.898.1@mobile.intern.polynaturedesign.com> <42DC9FEF.5020605@uzulabs.net> <20050719104624.826.2@mobile.intern.polynaturedesign.com> In-Reply-To: <20050719104624.826.2@mobile.intern.polynaturedesign.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF91CB4D5E3DA4214AD21B908" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --------------enigF91CB4D5E3DA4214AD21B908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon Lange wrote: > rh/fedora mit suse vergleichen... *pff* sakreleg! :D >=20 Tja... Das stimmt allerdings. Ich kann mir allerdings noch vorstellen, dass das manuelle Gefummel an den Prozess-Einstellungen vom Apache2 auch nicht unbedingt so optimal ist= =2E Aber wie ich in dem Rest des Threads ja gelesen habe swappt deine Maschine ja, da ist es kein Wunder, dass du so eine miese Performance hast. Ich w=FCrde dir raten f=FCr die Apache2 und MySQL-Prozesse jeweils = mal die Default-Einstellung zu suchen und damit zu testen. Zumindest kannst du damit den Speicherverbrauch wieder besser in geordnete Bahnen lenken. Ansonsten w=E4re es wohl wirklich sinnvoller die Server entsprechend zu teilen. DBs brauchen meist viel RAM und schnelle I/O und Webserver meist schnelle I/O. Apropos: I/O? Was hast denn f=FCr Platten? Laufen die auch im schnellsten= Modus? Fixes Dateisystem? Tipp: Benutze Gro=DF- und Kleinschreibung, dann kann mans besser lesen. Oder klemmt deine Shift-Taste ? ;) Und bitte die Antworten _unter_ dem Zitat. http://learn.to/quote/ Paul --=20 Linux-User #271918 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ --------------enigF91CB4D5E3DA4214AD21B908 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkLcz/4ACgkQqErKtBWD7VRNPgCfUhoM+bfRgRmxzaasvDnGyFPC 4ooAoKakG4KcMUMN61+Ybr9NKZZzLUoA =VcQj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF91CB4D5E3DA4214AD21B908--