Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19469 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2004 17:03:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2004 17:03:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1083 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2004 17:03:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 1010 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2004 17:03:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 984 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2004 17:03:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.248.18] (HELO dreadnought.cnchost.com) (207.155.248.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:03:19 -0800 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.client.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by dreadnought.cnchost.com id MAA07506; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:03:17 -0500 (EST) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20041104105623.209ebec8@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: admin%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:57:01 -0600 To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestMM.pm Cc: dev@perl.apache.org In-Reply-To: <418A5A3E.4060806@modperlcookbook.org> References: <20041103203722.78560.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <4189630D.2050607@stason.org> <418A5A3E.4060806@modperlcookbook.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 10:35 AM 11/4/2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: >>> -TEST_VERBOSE ?= 0 >>> +TEST_VERBOSE = 0 >> >> why not if (WIN32) {} then? > >do win32 environments add some magic WIN32 environment variable I can check >in the Makefile? if they do and we can work around them that's cool with me. If I had to guess, this borks anything but gmake. Test for that. Bill