httpd-test-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <>
Subject Re: extending t_cmp to handle !t_cmp?
Date Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:23:49 GMT
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>>anyway, in the end I guess I wouldn't suggest moving to T::M entirely
>>>yet.  but if you want to use it occasionally within certain tests I think
>>>that's fine.
>>Of course another alternative is to bundle a sufficient version of T::M
>>under t/.
> that's an idea.  so long as it's not installed with 'make install'.  or
> indexed by cpan either, I suppose.

anything living under t/ is not installed on 'make install' and not 
scanned by PAUSE.

>>I prefer to first see the output and then write the comparison test than
>>the other way around. I don't understand why T::M doesn't allow an
>>option to force the verbose output.
> I dunno the politics here, but it might make for a nice enhancement.  I'll
> look into it.

Great, thanks.

Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker     mod_perl Guide --->

View raw message