Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23689 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 21:18:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2004 21:18:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16391 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2004 21:18:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 16145 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2004 21:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15968 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2004 21:18:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [142.132.65.108] (HELO theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca) (142.132.65.108) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:18:04 -0700 Received: from theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i69LJmq9003537; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:19:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (randy@localhost) by theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i69LJmj1003533; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:19:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:19:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Randy Kobes To: Stas Bekman cc: test-dev@httpd.apache.org, David Wheeler , modperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache-Test module skeletons In-Reply-To: <40EF022F.2060601@stason.org> Message-ID: References: <40EC0235.1060804@modperlcookbook.org> <40EEE6E2.204@stason.org> <60709966-D1E1-11D8-AB4A-000A95972D84@kineticode.com> <40EEFB8A.8060204@stason.org> <555A0986-D1E4-11D8-AB4A-000A95972D84@kineticode.com> <40EF022F.2060601@stason.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: > Randy Kobes wrote: [ ... ] > > What about requiring 'Apache' for mp1-related modules > > (since 'Apache' doesn't exist within mp2), and for mp2 > > modules, requiring 'Apache2' (which doesn't exist within > > mp1)? > > It won't work since the version number lives in the > package mod_perl. and most likely you'd want to require a > minimal version at some point. That's true - I forgot about that ... One could tie the version of Apache.pm (for mp1) or Apache2.pm (for mp2) to the corresponding mod_perl.pm version, and make a note of that in the RELEASE notes, but I agree, that's not addressing the underlying issue. -- best regards, randy