Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96363 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 19:10:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 19:10:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 53745 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2004 19:07:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 53688 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2004 19:07:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 53645 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2004 19:07:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [195.154.174.52] (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.154.174.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:07:43 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B7D1E1BDF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:07:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E1BDE8.5060901@stason.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:07:20 -0700 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040617 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [Patch] add TEST_EXTRA_ARGS to allow passing arguments to t/TEST thru make invocation References: <40E07C83.3030301@ectoplasm.org> <40E10CBC.3050109@stason.org> <40E168A4.5090705@modperlcookbook.org> In-Reply-To: <40E168A4.5090705@modperlcookbook.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Geoffrey Young wrote: >>I'm not sure about the name choice. $(TEST_VERBOSE) and $(TEST_FILES) >>are the same as other Test packages use. Do they have $TEST_EXTRA_ARGS >>too? Otherwise we may better use some name specific to Apache-Test? > > > MakeMaker looks to support only three: TEST_VERBOSE, TEST_FILE(S), and > TESTDB_SW. > > so how about APACHE_TEST_EXTRA_ARGS? it's verbose but it shouldn't be too > bad and it beats making tons of extra targets. +1 -- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com