Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98741 invoked from network); 6 May 2004 18:14:33 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 May 2004 18:14:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 60007 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2004 18:14:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 59963 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2004 18:14:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 59927 invoked from network); 6 May 2004 18:14:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.154.174.52) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 May 2004 18:14:05 -0000 Received: from stason.org (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5FC1E18DF for ; Thu, 6 May 2004 20:14:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <409A806B.2010107@stason.org> Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 11:14:03 -0700 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: LWP 5.79 issues? References: <20040506141732.GA10505@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040506141732.GA10505@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joe Orton wrote: > I just tried httpd-test on a machine which has libwww-perl 5.79, and > it's failing all over the shop with this error (always the same): > > t/apache/rwrite............ok 104/114Use of uninitialized value in > length at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/HTTP/Message.pm line 132. > > anyone else seen this or something else to add to my TODO list? Just updated to this version and yes, I see the same problem. I'm looking at it now. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com