httpd-test-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: t_cmp oddities
Date Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:27:51 GMT
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>whichever is fine with me. Though please explain where did you take that
>>standard from? I think most modules follow the followinig import
>>convention:
>>
>>- a word 'foo' usually means symbol and you'd expect to be able to use
>>it in a form of (*$@%&)foo.
>>
>>- a tag ':foo' means, import a group of tags.
>>
>>- a string '-foo' means, tell import to do something, i.e. a command.
> 
> 
> outside of our world and CGI.pm I've never seen the '-foo' syntax.  that
> Exporter doesn't support it natively led me to believe that it was merely a
> convention used by only a few.  but I'll accept that it is more standard
> than I think :)

>>And I prefer 'withtestmore', to imply: don't not import symbols
>>exportable by Test::More.
> 
> 
> ok, withtestmore it is.  but if it's ok with you I still prefer the
> ':withtestmore' version - somehow the '-withtestmore' still looks strange to
> me, especially within quotes or qw and without an action (as in -compile =>
> qw(foo).

>>>but whatever.  I'm just trying to make userspace easier.
>>
>>
>>geoff++
> 
> 
> so you're in favor, then?  if you are, I figure I'll commit it and some
> docs, then hope some of the Test::More fans (hi David) can see if it makes
> life easier before the next release.

Yes, +1 to :withtestmore
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

Mime
View raw message