Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23552 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 19:01:54 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 19:01:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 98546 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2004 19:01:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98517 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2004 19:01:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98503 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 19:01:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.154.174.52) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 19:01:43 -0000 Received: from stason.org (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D031E1695 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:01:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <40438899.5050104@stason.org> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:01:45 -0800 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: new one: rwrite on aix with 1.3 References: <40437A30.4080609@Golux.Com> <40437B8F.6090102@stason.org> <40437F80.4020200@Golux.Com> In-Reply-To: <40437F80.4020200@Golux.Com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > >>Was httpd and the mod_test_rwrite.so module compiled with the same compiler? > > > just went through and reconfigured the server build, built it, installed > it, cleaned out the .so files in the framework tree, and re-ran > t/TEST -{stop,clean,configure) and then t/TEST . same results. it doesn't mean that the compiler and the same compile options were used, does it? > how could i tell how the module was built? by looking at the output of 'make test' (after 'make clean'). p.s. I'm not on AIX, so I'm just guessing here. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com