Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51938 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 23:52:58 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 23:52:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 61416 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2004 23:52:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61370 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2004 23:52:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61355 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 23:52:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO secure.exclamationlabs.net) (66.77.29.186) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 23:52:43 -0000 Received: from modperlcookbook.org (pcp05675728pcs.walngs01.pa.comcast.net [69.139.161.218]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by secure.exclamationlabs.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1KNqo209372 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:52:50 -0600 Message-ID: <40369DCA.20607@modperlcookbook.org> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:52:42 -0500 From: Geoffrey Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: passing -D values? References: <4036522B.9070008@modperlcookbook.org> <20040220224127.GA19043@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040220224127.GA19043@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:30:03PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>is there really no way to pass additional -D switches to the server? I >>can't see any, so unless I'm missing it... > > > Ooh, cool, I tried to add that feature earlier in the week too (and > didn't come up with a patch as simple as yours :). Get's my vote! good to know that not only was I not missing some implementation, but that others already have a use for it :) thanks for the feedback. committed. --Geoff