From test-dev-return-2236-apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Wed Jan 07 04:06:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43869 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2004 04:06:16 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2004 04:06:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 28674 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2004 04:05:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28633 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2004 04:05:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28574 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2004 04:05:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca) (142.132.1.82) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2004 04:05:55 -0000 Received: from theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i07410wK003436 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:01:00 -0600 Received: from localhost (randy@localhost) by theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i07410Oe003432 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:01:00 -0600 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:00:59 -0600 (CST) From: Randy Kobes To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: sticky preferences in Apache-Test In-Reply-To: <3FFB85AD.30602@stason.org> Message-ID: References: <3FFB85AD.30602@stason.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: > OK, here is a an extended version of Randy's original work > to be able to save and reuse A-T config. I've added first > time interactive configuration feature (similar to > CPAN.pm). It took me a long time to polish it as there are > so many possible cases on how this new feature can be > used, it was pretty tricky. I haven't quite tested -save > too. Also there could be some issues with win32, I'm sure > Randy will post a fix. It's a pretty big patch, let me > know if you want me to commit it and we will take it from > there, making it easier to users to test it. We probably > need to polish it somewhat. Great work, Stas! This is a deceptively tricky problem ... I for one would find it really convenient if you could commit it and work on it from there - I have trouble with longish patches getting them onto my Win32 system. -- best regards, randy