Return-Path: 
 <test-dev-return-2166-apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51386 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 01:20:39 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 01:20:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 37878 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2003 01:20:23 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37789 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2003 01:20:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:test-dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:test-dev@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37770 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 01:20:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO palrel11.hp.com) (156.153.255.246)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 01:20:22 -0000
Received: from xparelay1.ptp.hp.com (xparelay1.ptp.hp.com [15.1.28.62])
	by palrel11.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3911C07CA8
	for <test-dev@httpd.apache.org>; Mon,  1 Dec 2003 17:20:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xpabh3.ptp.hp.com (xpabh3.ptp.hp.com [15.1.28.63])
	by xparelay1.ptp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E9B1004BBB
	for <test-dev@httpd.apache.org>; Mon,  1 Dec 2003 17:20:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by xpabh3.ptp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <XNBF9KJS>; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:20:30 -0800
Message-ID: <304BDB72275BBB4DA590832B55A202914727B3@xsun04.ptp.hp.com>
From: "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <madhum@hp.com>
To: "'test-dev@httpd.apache.org'" <test-dev@httpd.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:20:27 -0800 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


I think I found the problem (.. and it's not the cgid exiting problem).

The problem was because the default Listen Backlog in mod_cgid was a little
small (100 outstanding connections). I got the following tusc log for the
httpd processes :

{62717} connect(13, 0x9fffffffbebbfe60, 94) .............. ERR#239
ECONNREFUSED
{62849} connect(29, 0x9fffffffbdcbfea0, 94) .............. ERR#239
ECONNREFUSED

I increased listen backlog and the processes are a little more happy now :)

BTW, I had to increase the "ListenBacklog" for httpd also - the default 512
caused too many "Can't connect" errors. I increased it to 1024.

-Madhu


>-----Original Message-----
>From: gregames@apache.org [mailto:gregames@apache.org]
>Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 1:48 PM
>To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99
>
>
>MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
>> Hmmn. Interesting.
>> 
>> 1. Did you include the cgid restart fix ?
>
>I don't think so.  It's the httpd-2.0.48 tarball + mod_specweb99.
>
>> 2. Are you driving the server with the SPECweb99 recommended 
>CGI load ?
>
>  DYNAMIC_CGI_GET=.005
>
>I believe that's the standard.
>
>Looking at server-status, I see the CGI URIs dominating the 
>active server 
>threads even with this tiny percentage of the total workload.  
>I'm using the 
>perl script shipped with SPECweb99.  An obvious improvement 
>would be to use a 
>compiled C implementation.  But I'm not very interested in 
>setting records or 
>making CGIs run fast.  I'm more interested in speeding up 
>mod_specweb99 and base 
>Apache.
>
>> 3. do you mind posting the httpd.conf
>
>attached.
>
> > Oh.. BTW I hope you're also using worker MPM .
>
>[gregames@monkey built]$ bin/httpd -l
>Compiled in modules:
>   core.c
>   worker.c
>   http_core.c
>   mod_suexec.c
>   mod_so.c
>
>Greg
>