Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10555 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 09:22:10 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 09:22:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 46766 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 09:21:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46656 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 09:21:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46626 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 09:21:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alien3) (212.244.37.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 09:21:43 -0000 Received: from szrenica ([192.168.37.115]) by port.defbank.com.pl (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA25333 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:21:53 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:21:52 +0100 From: Jacek Prucia To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Problems in using flood for mini_httpd Message-Id: <20031203102152.57049a04.j.prucia@defbank.com.pl> In-Reply-To: <3FCCB5AF.6010900@6wind.com> References: <3FCCB5AF.6010900@6wind.com> Organization: COMP =?ISO-8859-2?B?Unplc3rzdw==?= S.A. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 16:54:23 +0100 idir fodil wrote: > Hy all, > I have installed flood and I am trying to use it for mini_httpd > evaluation. All connections established by flood failed. > Does flood only oriented for httpd tests ? No. IIRC there are quirks in flood to make it work with various (buggy) web servers. > or there is some configuration to do in order to evaluate mini_httpd ? Your test might fall because flood is using 'verify_200' for response verification, like this: verify_200 Such verification will fail in some cases (e.g. when response is HTTP/1.0). Please try this: verify_status_code It is a bit slower (tokenizes response header), but is more bullet-proof. Hope this helps. regards, -- Jacek Prucia