Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69947 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2003 17:10:59 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2003 17:10:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 87420 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2003 17:08:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87382 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2003 17:08:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87341 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2003 17:08:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO striker.xs4all.nl) (213.84.19.217) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2003 17:08:57 -0000 Received: from cheetah (cheetah.striker.nl [192.168.0.10]) by striker.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AF703DFF25 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:06:34 +0200 (CEST) From: "Sander Striker" To: Subject: RE: question Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:06:34 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20030909172419.77976840.j.prucia@defbank.com.pl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Jacek Prucia [mailto:j.prucia@defbank.com.pl] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:24 PM > Looking at httpd release procedure, it apears that when tagging > httpd-2.0, both apr and apr-util are also tagged. I've checked some apr > files and they don't have FLOOD_1_0 tag, so I assume this doesn't apply > to flood, am I right? You are correct. > If so, we can't figure out what apr/apr-util libs are needed to compile > certain flood tag (for example FLOOD_1_0 won't compile against apr HEAD). > This doesn't seem to be a big problem, but I wanted to be sure if everybody > are OK with this. I'd say, require apr 1.0 for this release. You'll probably be able to sync the release nicely. Sander