Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46682 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2003 19:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46652 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2003 19:44:08 -0000 Received: from photon.poly.edu (128.238.32.22) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2003 19:44:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (ntuttle@localhost) by photon.poly.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA22004; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:43:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:43:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Norman Tuttle To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org cc: jacek.prucia@acn.waw.pl Subject: Re: flood: responsescript patch, take 2 In-Reply-To: <20030825002358.03845fb9.jacek.prucia@acn.waw.pl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jacek: Now that you've added this in, what exactly does it do? How does it hook into Flood to provide feedback from response data (or does it)? Do you have any example scripts that exhibit these properties? -Norman Tuttle ntuttle@opendemand.com (OpenDemand Systems) PS: We have interest because we are also thinking of expanding the response template paradigm and do not want to duplicate work done already. On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Jacek Prucia wrote: > > This is responsescript patch, but this time written around APR poll API. I'm > not sure if I have got everything right, so APR gurus are welcome to take a > look. I have tested this against a bunch of web pages, and didn't see any > problem though. > > regards, > Jacek Prucia