Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88022 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2002 21:14:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88010 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 21:14:02 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 14:14:08 -0700 Subject: Re: mod_specweb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: kforee27@aol.com Mime-Version: 1.0 From: kristiforee2000@mobile.att.net (KRISTI FOREE) To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org CC: kristiforee2000@mobile.att.net X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N i would like more info about this please Greg Ames wrote: > What do folks think about adding mod_specweb99 (attached) as an Apache = > httpd-test component? It is a module which allows you to benchmark Apa= che 2.0 > or 1.3 using the SPECweb99 benchmarking suite, described at > http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/ . =20 >=20 > While there certainly are improvements that could be made to the code, = I feel > it's in good enough shape now to put in a public CVS and have the benef= its of > many eyeballs looking at it. Several of us have been passing around ta= rballs, > diffs, and new versions of files, but that gets hard to manage pretty q= uickly. >=20 > Many thanks to Covalent Technologies for agreeing to donate this code t= o the > ASF, especially to Sander Temme and Dirk-Willem van Gulik who are the a= uthors.=20 > David Hill from Compaq has also been contributing a lot of 2.0 fixes. >=20 > Greg > Attachment not displayed: application/x-tar; name=3D"specweb99.tar" kristi foree