Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-test-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66374 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2001 18:21:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact test-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list test-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66363 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 18:21:17 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: mako.covalent.net: dougm owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:26:04 -0800 (PST) From: Doug MacEachern X-Sender: dougm@localhost To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: perl-framework: mod_dav but not mod_dav? In-Reply-To: <3C0CC93A.4010003@stason.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > Actually, we don't have to run -t to test for failure, since the normal > execution fails as well and for all cases (not only syntax errors). The > problem is that we run: > > system "command &"; we can run "$cmd -t|" before that and check if the output contains "Syntax OK" or not.