Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>I can extend it to engulf the plan() extension that we have added and then
>>the only function you will ever call with plan() is skip_unless. I
>>think this:
>>
>> plan ..., skip_unless('cgi', 'lwp');
>>
>
> there's no point in overloading plan anymore then. we should just change
> it to:
>
> skip_unless(...);
>
> plan tests => $tests;
>
> and have skip_unless() print "1..0\n..."; exit; if conditions are not met.
sounds good.
> personally, i would rather keep the the current plan shorthand and change
> skip_unless to be called as it is above.
I didn't get you? do you prefer to make this change and disengage skip
stuff from plan:
skip_unless(...);
plan tests => $tests;
or do you prefer:
plan ..., skip_unless('cgi', 'lwp');
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:stas@stason.org http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
|