Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 019E71942E for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66722 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2016 15:30:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66683 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2016 15:30:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact modules-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66666 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2016 15:30:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:30:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DFEBFC0257 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:30:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSnME00IYR75 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com (mail-io0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 97A8C5FB85 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f89so80293513ioi.0 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:30:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uS/Zp1LYLcOICPM56o/6/BH102wKXq6j1UEqOr/wIT0=; b=KZIB9tottVzC1KnU47sJYkg75f2s4ZYA0KDY7+uavUmZzoqFZA+2vcwK9wdVXwepGc H/PuUZKffWBN67gQhJeQZMjZlWXUbylKN1iz9wvRpoZgi4sP3YdSNURNrxbQeq7Lx4Pc DCknvV4oADXl4AHhdOxoumQ4gGgahNWYBL/Lp9Yf+IzqwagHFC0QdwPCz4siGi/6nMCu 9fAB/3l0jiTOPx18ez3Sojto6bH/7aN7lSfSc0oRw3m4u4mbt3aRKF597byUo1+YwRFo tOrHzV8YUPK6naONg9sMHMtg+oNQsg/7llfyDWMSPTEmlPITKXZTZKnQ5rosFwdKRBZS 9QlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uS/Zp1LYLcOICPM56o/6/BH102wKXq6j1UEqOr/wIT0=; b=luQAS7ZnRDmFzTf/xeYOaexTnHty1KZifyh8OSSLTEwmd2M1YijTIMj9kiRMDA698Q WiKC5TBxR69CPn/k7wI6hfzYwXG46gTdKS92PFvUW1ka2mlF9rB6iyKJ3UBXH8cMGdfV g5DDUUIzKlloYkUXMprKVSPDH0ezh6o+vIiwq+aIG5AWjh/NDIYEMP7yrK07zB5mlQFG Egr3xBPT4XVVdKsoJ5k/fuTCrDtbwDDOc0jCRDRo2WhXW21hA+8+yQ1ku+Jq96HJ3NvE hdYXnSOrBcfR77oQ7qV+pShX/Oz7uZo3oDXRHfDLxZd6frCSJwVvrimCqKiXZ+nPyoPn gCnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVt2IwFXNOANl+mk1RzimAR3nO+CHlVuHaM5vcaE1ZJEBcFYzcHnPPuvPErTuTglGmCNs+as9E+6Skc1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.154.18 with SMTP id c18mr19818188ioe.169.1461857404593; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.72.69 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:30:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57222BFA.4030000@redhat.com> References: <57222BFA.4030000@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:30:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Authz provider module: r->server->server_scheme is (null) From: Eric Covener To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Luk=C3=A1=C5=A1 Hellebrandt wrote: > Why is that? And is there any other way to get the used scheme? ap_http_scheme(r) for the requests scheme, as opposed to the servers. This is what the expression parser and mod_rewrite uses.