httpd-modules-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: apr_hash_t and global scope
Date Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:27:41 GMT

On 12 Dec 2013, at 02:41, Ingo Walz wrote:

> So socache with shared memory (shmcb) is the way you would suggest?

How important is the sharing in your case?  If it's just about performance,
you may be better-off accepting that each process will repeat the work
of populating the hash, if that's a smaller overhead than IPC.

If sharing is necessary, then socache will indeed serve, though you can
leave the choice of socache engine to your config.

I was also a little uneasy about your original description: the use of a
forever-pool becomes a memory leak if it is populated with per-request data.
Modules that do such things usually create their own pool (as a child of
the process pool) which they can then maintain privately.

-- 
Nick Kew

Mime
View raw message