From modules-dev-return-2762-apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Sun Nov 15 16:20:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4373 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2009 16:20:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2009 16:20:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 55280 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2009 16:20:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 55189 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2009 16:20:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact modules-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 55179 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2009 16:20:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:20:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.230.240.7] (HELO eastrmmtao101.cox.net) (68.230.240.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:20:53 +0000 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20091115162032.VEAR6358.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:20:32 -0500 Received: from eastrmwml49 ([172.18.18.217]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 5ULX1d00M4h0NJL02ULXQE; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:20:31 -0500 X-VR-Score: -230.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=eUPz9sOuNWAA:10 a=GPYG1n6kjboA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=0HZ4oJPCkdBWsbraGmsA:9 a=5_qwxIupRe14vNcUfxOjzUYFkn4A:4 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Received: from 70.177.187.4 by webmail.east.cox.net; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:20:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20091115112031.5BQDA.971161.imail@eastrmwml49> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:20:31 -0500 From: To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Static vs. Shared module precedence was Re: ap_sub_req_lookup_uri(r->uri, r, NULL)->content_type always returns 'text/plain'? Cc: Eric Covener In-Reply-To: <1404e5910911150510p6be3616fia376e0e4ae1b8c57@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal ---- Eric Covener wrote: > > Is the problem that the original Apache was on a 64-bit system? > > > > Could the Apache API on the 64-bit system be behaving differently than on a 32-bit system? > > Seems unlikely. I also checked and mod_limitipconn and mod_mime don't > even operate in the same hook. > > Perhaps see the comments in mid_dir's usage of ap_sub_req_lookup_uri()? > > -- > Eric Covener > covener@gmail.com Eric, I'm not clear what you meant by: "Perhaps see the comments in mid_dir's usage of ap_sub_req_lookup_uri()?". Did you mean "mod_dir"? Jim