Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75705 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2009 04:42:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2009 04:42:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 86726 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2009 04:42:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 86698 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2009 04:42:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact modules-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 86687 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2009 04:42:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:42:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrejvanderzee@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.170] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:42:13 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so477398wfg.15 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:41:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WrNB/ukMUHhOnnrC/UkidyjXWxVmBGfVvJ9vbKF5P9k=; b=DEU7BMkk2XuwJUpPQY3edTWE2luYixDAqfMU3U+DwFM68jMM0J7Ru+4AnnDoCiSKTT /dYWkR7LbGKuL2CGBDpFc5qZ+jfOURhIOyBaEH2nj5drxtUN+ruAfjCCGQDehNLQTdC8 XnYa/kd6guGg3jl0KfLQXdrG9jwaLpNWUpZ2I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HLh7r9N70pOUZ4vIKIp48EGb/UkLp9JG1aUvh1OFsll1BQz+KgiBSq0f9KISoMZHc/ GQj+8jITg3DZ3+Bz5b2+TwUxbVvUxYlf1WVYbyQRSSjgrVkQtqlkDoI9LFfuIIrq8eBr 1Ux6hPkczDAFz9IH/SHXXJfuYKwSAmmnNkz3Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.13.14 with SMTP id 14mr766628wfm.153.1237437712566; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:41:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49C1CB4E.6010204@gmail.com> References: <6456355d0903170523t786f3773m335588bbd8091423@mail.gmail.com> <20170a030903170946v5f903cfw1bc8aa0d46cfaf51@mail.gmail.com> <6456355d0903181904t2a55f584uf9b3f6afdf0fb6e6@mail.gmail.com> <49C1CB4E.6010204@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:41:52 +0900 Message-ID: <6456355d0903182141s218aed0s364e7231421f7a4a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: child_init for threads? From: Andrej van der Zee To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Thanks. > > Yes. create_connection() is the first hook run as part of request > processing, a delay in create_connection() will result in a delay in HTTP > processing. > That's too bad. I guess I have to hack this into the MPM then. One more question, what would be the way to store thread-specific data that is to be re-used across HTTP requests? Is there an example where this is done before? Thank you, Andrej