httpd-modules-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Houser, Rick" <>
Subject RE: Setting a handler within a configuration directive
Date Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:56:48 GMT
Contract, as in the piece of paper you get someone to sign in order to
license your software.  It would spell out the responsibilities of both
parties for support, penalties for violating those terms (ex. running at
levels above the paid entitlement), etc.  I mean the exact same meaning
of the word as used in higher-end desktop software.  EULAs don't really
hold much legal standing, specifically because they are NOT contracts.
You need a signature of some kind from both you and your customer
agreeing to the terms.


Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Sam
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Setting a handler within a configuration directive

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Houser, Rick <>
> Don't things like SSL client auth (pre-HTTP connection) internally 
> show as basic auth?  Isn't it just as trivial to make a module that 
> does nothing more than set the auth-type string to basic?  A simple 
> contract (real contract, not EULA garbage), should give you far more 
> protection than any of this.


What do you mean by contract?  I am coming from a desktop application
development background, so there are some basics about web development
that I simply don't know;)


View raw message