Mailing-List: contact modules-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of support@bettercgi.com
 designates 216.17.105.202 as permitted sender)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:49:20 -0500
From: Ray Morris <support@bettercgi.com>
Subject: Re: Apache Version
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <BAY112-W47DDDB39CBEB36126B2419F16E0@phx.gbl> (from
	apache.brave@live.com on Mon Aug 18 10:34:49 2008)
Message-Id: <1219078160.3026.1@raydesk1.bettercgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   Six and half years after it was released, Apache 2=20
is definitely ready!  Some newer modules and tools either=20
have no Apache 1.3 version or a hackish back port to 1.3,=20
so I'd definitely not recommend 1.3 for any new installation.
--
Ray B. Morris
support@bettercgi.com

Strongbox - The next generation in site security:
http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/

Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control
http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/

Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program:
http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php


On 08/18/2008 10:34:49 AM, John Hosie wrote:
> OK. I know there are good things about each. But in this day, is
> Apache 2 yet "ready for prime time"? Or are we best still using one=20
> of
> the flavors of Apache 1?
> _________________________________________________________________
> See what people are saying about Windows Live.  Check out featured
> posts.
> http://www.windowslive.com/connect?ocid=3DTXT_TAGLM_WL_connect2_082008