Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 81436 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2007 23:15:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2007 23:15:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 47101 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2007 23:15:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46882 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2007 23:15:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact modules-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46873 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2007 23:15:24 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:15:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of djwortham@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.224] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:15:12 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so681774wri for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:14:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=gMKcBDugtJYRoJUhAhOYHEXbjFeVZznXpEXRK12Z+AX7si26Pb9pyuTSCn+bEDoCwxxvmfIXeLlqfvRRap1FkbzSWyegN8ie3GzvAXvviqLLVTsMqdTPEwYLe5KV7g9JNlthl1gHcsSS8HmmIsVaqzfy0Rl1pcRK6BjmRv5NAQU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Smj4sDtm3zqqy+PDLWzekR6q8jKsDMNgbWiiEcO0nBYpvscar6w+Qe1wR7u4vKdlBft0BdD2AK0QYBZR/yoa6mXtydJwFWHZaRSGfYR7QNPhOvrnKONiXyCC694dDXmciTgjqCwToMltNDQCLtwDE1OaPr89fI95983s0jI/nJ4= Received: by 10.114.169.2 with SMTP id r2mr1269074wae.1172272491748; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.88.10 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:14:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5280fae50702231514k46d5bc9k6069f84ea96d1062@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:14:51 -0700 From: "David Wortham" To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Sending a POST request and handling the response from a module In-Reply-To: <1172266138.4186.6.camel@test.asus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_56397_7801639.1172272491716" References: <5280fae50702221615j6e4eace7t4fbb3c8323842c08@mail.gmail.com> <1172266138.4186.6.camel@test.asus> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_56397_7801639.1172272491716 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline While I really like Nick's response (regarding creating a subrequest through mod_proxy), one of my supervisors doesn't like the fact that we require mod_proxy to be installed for my module to work (took me a couple of searches on some newsgroups to get it compiled/installed/activated myself). I will look into Serf, but I'm not sure that I will like the results (seeing that it is still in its infancy stages). Thanks for the responses guys! Regards, Dave Response from Nick Kew: -- Um, that's a quick&dirty hack, and likely to require significantly more work to re-use an AN Other context. If I were rewriting that now, I think I'd base it around a mod_proxy subrequest instead. -- Response from Joachim: -- http://code.google.com/p/serf/ might do that. Stumpled across it some days ago. -- ------=_Part_56397_7801639.1172272491716--