Mailing-List: contact mbox-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 21:17:57 -0700
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
To: Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com>
Cc: mbox-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r160602 [1/3] - in httpd/mod_mbox/trunk: ./ config/
 m4/ module-2.0/
Message-ID: <20050418041757.GB29417@scotch.ics.uci.edu>
Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>,
	Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com>, mbox-dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <20050408203054.7502.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
 <20050416072311.GS29417@scotch.ics.uci.edu>
 <4260C9FB.2090200@force-elite.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4260C9FB.2090200@force-elite.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:16:59AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> >Should we be better off just adding in body_start, msg_start, and body_end
> >sizeof?  
> 
> To clarify, do you mean remove caching of the other fields, eg from, 
> subject, etc?

I meant making it explicit as to what fields are used rather than assuming
that all fields were the same size.  I see you figured this out in your later
commits.  Thanks!  -- justin