Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CAD200BA5 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:24:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 65DA9160AEA; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 824C2160ADE for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:24:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 32120 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2016 13:24:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 32110 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2016 13:24:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:24:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 06013C0595 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:24:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.22 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.22 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rcbowen-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0GupLC37XW1 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f172.google.com (mail-qt0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D87D25F1C2 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f172.google.com with SMTP id f6so19226391qtd.2 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:24:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rcbowen-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=OA+xz7ys+4eP1Y9jKsI9qjGWYEeKgGd7oRbBNzlvgdk=; b=RRVakBCQ54xS28NxhqDTNCxYdzfK9S2D4BCL3+urKtR7eha2GP+R1ulWwPkYVspH6j PHw1e2vay9vtlY7N1cZt/iOlIjbb5JvUUThjA3ifK44kQtGXYZR3rTmXrzbt2qcrNWo7 YcLVa7SOdyi+1S0Ad5tJ/09sjOjILZ6nj3s+78r5c25c8niVqUqsWonJtEy1k8awvJFy 5f6T439aw+6CxIKaArcpwkVCSwKtTj/eFczF55cx0IEgHp6waiuvsws/6Vf5ex4AeNRA 07ikDRL9R8ptX1x5OAPEXS4lGDPZ9HC7qLu93myWN4/Zo2pGU+9O1Nt2UfindXW+6YNe /8bw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version; bh=OA+xz7ys+4eP1Y9jKsI9qjGWYEeKgGd7oRbBNzlvgdk=; b=UnZLA5/yjBYYr6ByBUFBxRd3GZw2Sf/1axMLWsm/Msek9BZB8mT3JWQ2u+4uAMmz0P 0pL+FKsxm3dHPQh09RrkAIX2tI4QzkSBgMc48WSMKFu9S4rznWpu2mR4L7qGmA/JzVVS Da6Pc4MdJV+XqpDhvvOnSEAsDi5Udy1jIANPPz61tbvHYmp1mcwf5n04imPthHhFAR8U h/Hqp1LzYRjm2azUBxRBSvMAS/M2sSjonVsbg5sQ5lKVbPfKjohztn7kE8RPcge4OTkX fWbqVnzO2FApI/LJsdTdLfXcadDLG2+wOywZvQSVDYSQyABCV8fefQbA5zMNY3Y5FqRr /IVg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcvVak6xubxxiRW4y6zRon7zxY0d43KWTjrpnMqtdUHbGGAbNFNFSCMaua2dgBwpA== X-Received: by 10.200.58.135 with SMTP id x7mr1102870qte.93.1476883469570; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.207] (cpe-192-180-213-35.kya.res.rr.com. [192.180.213.35]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n77sm20840323qkn.28.2016.10.19.06.24.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:24:28 -0700 (PDT) To: docs@httpd.apache.org From: Rich Bowen Subject: Translations (IRC conversation) Message-ID: <8b7e6fa1-4042-603b-78e4-54e7a727ce4c@rcbowen.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:24:25 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mQDH2GjKeuaB0P0GCb7F1sWAAHPtjIcCR" archived-at: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:24:42 -0000 --mQDH2GjKeuaB0P0GCb7F1sWAAHPtjIcCR Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="jjuO28Gdi5W2MwqlVcxK3QNn2hhhmgoPs"; protected-headers="v1" From: Rich Bowen To: docs@httpd.apache.org Message-ID: <8b7e6fa1-4042-603b-78e4-54e7a727ce4c@rcbowen.com> Subject: Translations (IRC conversation) --jjuO28Gdi5W2MwqlVcxK3QNn2hhhmgoPs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (Summarizing a conversation from IRC) ezra-s (Daniel Ferradal) is beginning to work on our Spanish docs translation. This led to discussion of a number of points surrounding translations: * There are some (numerous?) .es files in 2.4 that are not in trunk. These need to be identified, and where appropriate, copied/moved into trunk, so that they are not lost in the future. Translation work should (usually) happen in trunk first, and then be (intelligently - of course some stuff is trunk-only) copied to 2.4 and possibly (?) 2.2. We have apparently done a poor job of communicating and policing this, and need to update our translation docs accordingly. The usual catchphrase is, Upstream First. * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a translation hasn't been touched since 2.4.0, I would recommend dropping it. Discussio= n? * It also occurs to me that we should make specific recommendations of which docs should be translated first. For example, I think that the "Getting Started" doc, and the "HowTo" docs, would be good places to start, while the module docs, being more about technical detail and having a less conversational style, would come later. * All of this hinges on actually getting translators. It *seems* that this used to be easier, but lately we have really stunk at attracting new translators. I think that this might be because our review process is so rigorous, and it's hard to find reviewers. But for certain languages (Spanish, French, Japanese, Chinese, Russian) it would seem that we have an enormous pool of users to draw from. Perhaps time to do some recruiting on users@? I believe we should first address the above items, though, so that they're coming into a well-documented encouraging environment, rather than picking up a lot of abandoned partially translated things. Indeed, it might be good to go ahead and drop entire languages from trunk, so that a new translator has a clean slate to work with. I know I find that less frustrating, myself. Please discuss, so I'm not just talking to myself. :-) --=20 Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon --jjuO28Gdi5W2MwqlVcxK3QNn2hhhmgoPs-- --mQDH2GjKeuaB0P0GCb7F1sWAAHPtjIcCR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYB3QJAAoJEHhwUUeLEqujohoP/0I8XlugOfTOglNX4NekEpRm miS734B/tKL34lCQ/1Pb8NtLzjwDDn5zjIyYas+f4vrd2T4iwMVyQ5HDOod1zlUa X2vm/6/zByZ24OClezchQ8NHgjn4JSxKezp9GLHs1YJA+N1L5d25x6lLXo21W+j7 0KU2zsAfZuQRhxL7rxeBKNxfuSI2iAPISx458H5dl2bQlJuaE3b+fU8nQwyzFSDc qRGJJ5Vo2ti9FcdFJHQBzzmhDSVTwH+yHGo8YoBZHr7JhEwtO0tAa6IuC+Zz8f+q uqstb5XU1PoXnsXzCZIGv7gTqBgxLWWiZw1XlnoiUy1XaF5O1NIWAP42Z/+0s5L6 rMp+FPUnlZcj3/4dDUpOG5ibsKAqXu3bo6AvE0HTkW1EABSBQ8oWA+lIm8zGthOY n81egBvKfjo7l0W3H5IAA1CR+jUrieZBX1wgwgqT2dV+8Nh7wK6sveX4XkopPiPH b/e+lk7vdWKRTr72RqowfbmZGtWBYK7a8d1nSLCkwoZoa59h14z1Cb47MZFcFr6i CBiMoxbMtNGAV0zc6EwA1OeRe4AWIj98ydskyxi0WiUDWZsCVZS4WDNXwvoNJCJv 3W6KO38TWLlsg5xGKnD6AsFuwVorfa3jZgww2R8uCTQ37u0d1TM14fM15FlW5zYM W9niq5rNWViAMIhykkfO =1nln -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mQDH2GjKeuaB0P0GCb7F1sWAAHPtjIcCR--