Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Message-ID: <557EEA70.2060208@univ-lorraine.fr>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:08:32 +0200
From: Lucien GENTIS <lucien.gentis@univ-lorraine.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: HTML entities
References: <557C4FC4.20609@univ-lorraine.fr>
 <201506151510.15764@news.perlig.de>
In-Reply-To: <201506151510.15764@news.perlig.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Le 15/06/2015 15:10, André Malo a écrit :
> * Lucien Gentis wrote:
>
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> Since we use Unicode in XML files, do we still need to replace
>> accentuated characters like é or è by HTML entities ?
> I'd prefer to leave that a translator's group's decision. The editor problem
> is still present (it's also independent from locale, editors usually do not
> care about that, apart from filenames, sometimes).
>
> nd

What do you mean by "The editor problem is still present" ?

If a committer uses Latin-1 in his editor, I suppose he (or she) mostly 
edit english files, or files in his own language ; so he probably won't 
have problem displaying accentuated characters.

I personally use gvim editor (vim-gtk) under Ubuntu 14.04, and even if 
its encoding setting is independent from locale, its default encoding is 
UTF8. So I only wanted to know if writing directly accentuated 
characters without replacing them by HTML entities could cause a problem 
with the build process, or somewhat . . .


-- 
Lucien GENTIS
UNIVERSITE DE LORRAINE - ESPE
Centre de Ressources Informatiques
5, Rue Paul Richard
C.O. 3 - MAXEVILLE
54528 LAXOU-CEDEX

Tél. 03 83 17 68 42
Email : lucien.gentis@univ-lorraine.fr


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org