httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Gruno <rum...@cord.dk>
Subject Re: End of life for 2.0 documentation?
Date Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:32:32 GMT
On 07/14/2012 02:38 PM, Tim Bannister wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2012, at 20:31, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> 
>> I take it then, that no one would be terribly upset if I added a
>> canonical reference in the 2.0 branch to the 2.2 branch. I think
>> pointing to 2.4 at this point would most likely just confuse both people
>> and the search engines, since so much has changed since 2.0.
> 
> There might be a Link: relation type that means “superseded by”. 2.0 was superseded
by 2.2, 2.2 by 2.4, etc.
> 
> I'll have a look. It costs little to add, and somebody or some bot might find it useful.
> 
Yes, that's exactly what the canonical link type does, and that's what
I've implemented in the 2.0 docs.

I am happy to report that, thanks to those links, Google now lists the
2.2 documentation instead of 2.0 when searching for common issues or
modules.

With regards,
Daniel.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message