httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Gruno <rum...@cord.dk>
Subject Re: End of life for 2.0 documentation?
Date Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:31:50 GMT
I take it then, that no one would be terribly upset if I added a
canonical reference in the 2.0 branch to the 2.2 branch. I think
pointing to 2.4 at this point would most likely just confuse both people
and the search engines, since so much has changed since 2.0.

This first update (I'll get on that right away) will be for the sake of
search engines (hopefully) displaying at least 2.2 as recommended
reading instead of 2.0. I'm not so sure about adding the 'noindex' meta
tag to it just yet, since that would most likely make it invisible to
people even if they searched for 2.0 documentation. We need to come to a
decision on whether to retire the 2.0 docs before we should make a move
like that. And once we have that decision, we can do with 2.0 what we
did with 1.3.

With regards,
Daniel.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message