Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF20B9FFD for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2202 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2012 13:45:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2161 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2012 13:45:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2151 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2012 13:45:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2012 13:45:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.173] (HELO mail-qc0-f173.google.com) (209.85.216.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2012 13:44:58 +0000 Received: by qcsc20 with SMTP id c20so289644qcs.18 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:44:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=r81UIgjP9/VPsS/qpZdCTzIYslR8DRlAPquO5XrSm9I=; b=GPMMkvLt9FJnSqPOlxWt5bszNQxiTSVHi0GMW64KukXzQmviz5zBYjrXjNQW8G3HdN DnK2yws8zHddJwzRFshFj97Iu0kOyA163+RVSwZc5IXD/kt1CCWTMFm+rZsw+f3faJqp 2MPAQHPnFIrc6LWTBjx/3W6aucuNaeNqkYKkgsdo2fEtkYGnuMBfsnUpbhZ+Gjbzc/dn I/oxws18GyDWdjG1JDwlwR+8RCmszktdgogoYNWpMlhpRXsDYN2m98pAJkY+W2gPFh5w T77FUJI7TBKRR6xeqsgc06TrhHLCk86yMnQLdPOXWi5ltsYs/lZRmetuXwS/Kpku+e3e ADAw== Received: by 10.224.32.193 with SMTP id e1mr5113407qad.44.1336571077168; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.198] (74-131-224-250.dhcp.insightbb.com. [74.131.224.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s20sm10248364qap.16.2012.05.09.06.44.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 May 2012 06:44:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Rich Bowen Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DFFAA39A-C311-4F65-8F12-2F1A9BD4B2CB" Subject: Re: Questions for further discussion about Documentation commentary system Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 09:44:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <07AB601C-8DBE-41BF-B37C-AC0B79951876@medecine.uhp-nancy.fr> To: docs@httpd.apache.org References: <90E76ABC-29E3-4AB1-9213-755051C218EA@medecine.uhp-nancy.fr> <4FAA5DF9.4060902@cord.dk> <07AB601C-8DBE-41BF-B37C-AC0B79951876@medecine.uhp-nancy.fr> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkpu5oF8ss+GkrAaxav4rL0hbCuezsdtz7uF9eVtK+8p60Y7FAvBUp4BdExbCz+VFxblKdZ --Apple-Mail=_DFFAA39A-C311-4F65-8F12-2F1A9BD4B2CB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On May 9, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Lucien Gentis wrote: > I agree. > I only meant that if a comment is 2.2 and 2.4 related, it should = appear in each version. > But how could it be achieved ? > Each time a moderator validates a comment in 2.4 docs for example, he = should verify > if it's also 2.2 related, and if it is, port it to 2.2 > This could lead to big work for the moderators. Sure, but that's what we do now already. When we apply a doc change, we = have to consider what branches need the change, and make it there, = otherwise the branches drift out of sync, creating more work later. -- Rich Bowen rbowen@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen rbowen@apache.org --Apple-Mail=_DFFAA39A-C311-4F65-8F12-2F1A9BD4B2CB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
I = agree.
I only meant that if a comment is 2.2 and 2.4 related, = it should appear in each version.
But how could it be achieved = ?
Each time a moderator validates a comment in 2.4 docs for = example, he should verify
if it's also 2.2 related, and if it = is, port it to 2.2
This could lead to big work for the = moderators.

Sure, but = that's what we do now already. When we apply a doc change, we have to = consider what branches need the change, and make it there, otherwise the = branches drift out of sync, creating more work later.

--
Rich Bowen
rbowen@rcbowen.com :: = @rbowen
rbowen@apache.org





= --Apple-Mail=_DFFAA39A-C311-4F65-8F12-2F1A9BD4B2CB--