Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of i.galic@brainsware.org
 designates 188.40.115.121 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:17:27 -0000 (UTC)
From: Igor =?utf-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?= <i.galic@brainsware.org>
To: docs@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Relaxing docs review policy?
Message-ID: <e42de5bd-3851-4b13-8fa0-3f3b11053b42@iris>
In-Reply-To: <2261BD4B-7B24-4488-96C6-EA1BEAC5892B@rcbowen.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


----- Original Message -----
> It has been mentioned several times that we'd have more translations
> if we'd relax the review policy a little.
> 
> 
> I'd like to propose that we loosen it up on trunk, so that the
> translations can at least get into the tree, and then actively
> solicit reviews (on users@, for example) before pushing them into
> trunk. I think that by requiring review of the patches, rather than
> putting them into trunk, we make it unreasonably hard for reviewers
> to actually have a look at them. Whereas if they were in trunk,
> reviewers could look at the rendered docs on the /docs/trunk web
> site, and we'd be more likely to get feedback.
> 
> 
> Thoughts?

So we're making trunk CTR? Like for the code?
+1

> --
> Rich Bowen
> rbowen@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
> rbowen@apache.org


i

-- 
Igor Gali=C4=87

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515  2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org