Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E17173AE for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99005 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2011 20:27:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98914 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2011 20:27:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact docs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: docs@httpd.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list docs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98906 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2011 20:27:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:27:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.45] (HELO mail-bw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.214.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:27:44 +0000 Received: by bkbzu5 with SMTP id zu5so3465765bkb.18 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:27:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LP8/1U94LjFTxm0JHg5SXlrHsGHfpPVf+c4c/LOynrk=; b=kGTQ8nAL+mDzhVUu5Bm7fiaBLGPucPEkqY/Ssz+40gy0+/uk4E32d0rzdcK/uk6RGF RtN33XD/7agES+KDmYdXPtdWa1X/95oD6BDQgOwMX5MfQVuvLtUWNIzuASEXZEG07I31 bIuKKnXoO/2G5B/jMeKzBuv7vmFGxC2Az9px8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.208 with SMTP id y16mr139453bkw.72.1321561642724; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.120.3 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:27:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <30003C90-6887-4569-BFD9-1F8FF6AFF6CB@rcbowen.com> References: <30003C90-6887-4569-BFD9-1F8FF6AFF6CB@rcbowen.com> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:27:22 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: do we have/need a chart of module dependencies in 2.4, or some convention in each module's doc for showing that? From: Jeff Trawick To: docs@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > e.g., proxy-balancer needs slotmem-shm* > > in 2.4 this is a lot less obvious than proxy-http needs proxy > > *a more complex and correct explanation is certainly possible, but > down near the surface of the earth it needs to be clear that in > general you need to also load X in order to use Y > > We do not. It would be really helpful to have that as an item in the > standard module doc head along with Description and Status. The dictionary entry for Dependency could explain the different types of dependencies -- explicit module vs provider. I'm struggling with what exactly to declare for provider-type dependencies. List the group, which links to a section of some provider overview page that shows the bundled implementers of that group? Or just explicitly list the bundled modules? > Are there cases > where a diagram would be more useful than just listing dependencies? It might save some time when planning a highly-customized build to look at a table or chart or ???. (better for the wiki perhaps) > > > -- > Rich Bowen > rbowen@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen > rbowen@apache.org > > > > > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org