httpd-docs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Suexec doc (Was Re: Fixing confusion of Apache vs httpd)
Date Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:26:28 GMT
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Noirin Shirley <noirin@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>> Summary:
>>
>> It appears that the majority is in favor of 'Apache HTTP Server' when
>> referred to in full, but there doesn't seem to be much of a consensus of how
>> this should be abbreviated, so that we don't have to say the full name every
>> time.
>
> Looking at the example sentences below, it seems to me that "Apache
> HTTP Server" and "the server" could be the solution to all of this.

Yes; this will be the readable solution in many instances.  (I think
Dan suggested something like this -- maybe "the web server" -- in a
different thread.)

>
>> In deciding what file to serve for a given request, the server's
>>    default behavior is to take the URL-Path for the request (the part
>>    of the URL following the hostname and port) and add it to the end
>>    of the <directive module="core">DocumentRoot</directive> specified
>>    in your configuration files.
>>
>>
>> Apache HTTP Server is also capable of <a href="vhosts/">Virtual
>>    Hosting</a>, where the server receives requests for more than one
>>    host.
>>
>> Apache HTTP Server offers several different ways to accomplish this.
>>
>
> The last is mildly clunky, but I don't think there's a completely
> clunk-free option on the table anyway.
>
> N


-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message