Hi Dan,
I feel that even though the content is more or less same between the two docs, their content is more organized. In the HEADER directive document, there is no ambiguity to a new user on the numbering of the arguments, and their usage. Perhaps it is just me - when I read the HEADER directive on apache docs it took me 3-4 reads before getting it right, but their (IBM) presentation of the same content was easier to understand and grasp (no ambiguity, whatsoever).
Just my two cents.

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Dan Poirier <poirier@pobox.com> wrote:
Sreedhar Madullapalli <sreedhar.apache@gmail.com> writes:

> Thanks for the prompt correction, and consideration. Not sure if I can
> mention any documentation references outside the ASF foundations, but this
> httpd documentation on IBM's website does a real good job of documenting the
> mod_headers, and HEADER directive.
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/iseries/v5r2/ic2924/info/rzaie/rzaiemod_headers.htm

What do you see there that you think is better than the apache docs?

> I did check the dev trunk (2.3) and though the rewording take care of the
> ambiguity, I feel that there is room for improvement.
> -Sreedhar

Specific suggestions for improvement are always welcome, or even better,


To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org

-Sreedhar Rao